| DDD Forum https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/ |
|
| Adam Lambert https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=568 |
Page 175 of 207 |
| Author: | Sir [ Wed May 30, 2012 3:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Yousha wrote: That and Born to be Wild are my absolute least favorite performances from Adam lambert. I dont like him much in general, but yeah, he completely ruined these 2 songs. On a different note, he does a decent job with WLL and a surprisingly good job with mad world and feeling good, both which I really like. Seriously Timi, can you find a version of Change is gonna come which is inferior to lambert's from a song point of view ? Yeah cause Born To Be Wild was SUCH a good song to begin with P.S. Worst Lambo covers were Cryin' and One live (even if the E5 was amazing) |
|
| Author: | Yousha [ Wed May 30, 2012 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Fuck yeah, One and Cryin were terrible. Also, Born to be wild is a catchy fun and feel good rocker. lambert ruined it completely, and it was no longer a fun rocker, but an un-listenable something. Also, yeah, the singing is ok in change is gonna come. but he ruins it as far as a song goes. |
|
| Author: | JRB [ Wed May 30, 2012 3:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Lambert simply does not have the voice for that kind of song, IMHO. It was always my least favorite AI studio recording of his. As far as his new album... I thought the first half of the album was better than FYE, but pretty much all of the "power ballads" were real snoozers. I also feel that vocally it's every so slightly less impressive than FYE. However I think the singles he'll release will be much better. "Naked Love" and "Shady" are killer. But "Better Than I Know Myself", "Nirvana", "Outlaws Of Love"....zzzzzzz |
|
| Author: | Val Salva [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Yousha wrote: Fuck yeah, One and Cryin were terrible. Also, Born to be wild is a catchy fun and feel good rocker. lambert ruined it completely, and it was no longer a fun rocker, but an un-listenable something. Also, yeah, the singing is ok in change is gonna come. but he ruins it as far as a song goes. What do you think about his live version of ACIGC? That was the one I was defending. |
|
| Author: | Yousha [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Val Salva wrote: Yousha wrote: Fuck yeah, One and Cryin were terrible. Also, Born to be wild is a catchy fun and feel good rocker. lambert ruined it completely, and it was no longer a fun rocker, but an un-listenable something. Also, yeah, the singing is ok in change is gonna come. but he ruins it as far as a song goes. What do you think about his live version of ACIGC? That was the one I was defending. not to my liking. most of lambert isnt. I can admit that he is incredibly talented, but completely not my cup of tea. I wish he joined dream theater, that's where he belongs |
|
| Author: | Yousha [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Just heard Shady. Very cool. |
|
| Author: | beyonddeities [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
One, apart from one bum note, is a flawless live performance. The E5 he hit was the cleanest I have ever heard, hands down. You guys are tearing apart subjective aspects of a performance. His actual technical skill at handling all songs, except for BTBW which is very shrill, was spot on. Maybe not to your tastes, but spot on. |
|
| Author: | beyonddeities [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Yousha wrote: Just heard Shady. Very cool. I'd like to know what you think of Kickin' In, it's very MJ |
|
| Author: | beyonddeities [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Timitzii wrote: JRB wrote: "Naked Love" and "Shady" are killer. Those two are cool. I also enjoy "Trespassing" very much. JRB wrote: But "Better Than I Know Myself", "Nirvana", "Outlaws Of Love"....zzzzzzz I agree. If you were a stoner you would like Nirvana.... |
|
| Author: | beyonddeities [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Not even as a performer, I mean specifically as a guy who can deliver notes and slide up and down scales with ease. His interpretation of a song and stylistic choices are what people commonly use to be like "yeah that was terrible" which is fine but if you're going to use it in a technical sense when ranking him as a singer you're missing the point of the lists. Plenty of vocalists aren't my cup of tea but I won't put them in last place just because I don't think they embody my particular envisioning of a rockstar. |
|
| Author: | Yousha [ Wed May 30, 2012 5:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
no one;s judging him technically here though. I said all those performances were terrible, and they were. NOT technically, I dont care about that. As mentioned, Dream Theater are about as flawless and brilliant as a band gets technically, but that's all they have going for them. |
|
| Author: | Sir [ Wed May 30, 2012 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
JRB wrote: As far as his new album... I thought the first half of the album was better than FYE, but pretty much all of the "power ballads" were real snoozers. Pretty much, as for the "power ballads" I really liked "Broken English" and "Underneath" was an amazing vocal. "Nirvana" > "BTIKM" > "OOL" > "Chokehold" Quote: "Naked Love" and "Shady" are killer. You should cover one of them. I watch your vids on YouTube all the time BTW I think it's cool that even the Lambo haters are into "Shady" |
|
| Author: | beyonddeities [ Wed May 30, 2012 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Yousha wrote: no one;s judging him technically here though. I said all those performances were terrible, and they were. NOT technically, I dont care about that. As mentioned, Dream Theater are about as flawless and brilliant as a band gets technically, but that's all they have going for them. I guess, true |
|
| Author: | queenrosered [ Wed May 30, 2012 7:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
Patrick wrote: throwing this out there, he would look much better with the red hair and a fist up his ass I'm sure the SAME could be said for YOU. PS: Question is, could you SING as well as him with a fist up your ass?
|
|
| Author: | queenrosered [ Wed May 30, 2012 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Adam Lambert |
beyonddeities wrote: Not even as a performer, I mean specifically as a guy who can deliver notes and slide up and down scales with ease. His interpretation of a song and stylistic choices are what people commonly use to be like "yeah that was terrible" which is fine but if you're going to use it in a technical sense when ranking him as a singer you're missing the point of the lists. Plenty of vocalists aren't my cup of tea but I won't put them in last place just because I don't think they embody my particular envisioning of a rockstar. THIS.
|
|
| Page 175 of 207 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|