| DDD Forum https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/ |
|
| Radiohead https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=101 |
Page 41 of 68 |
| Author: | chicken sandwich [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
to me it's definitely on par with Hail to the Thief and maybe Amnesiac |
|
| Author: | pnoom [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
It is definitely better than both of those albums and at least on par with The Bends. |
|
| Author: | zephead8 [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
woah pnoom is that based on the albums as they are or when you're done tinkering with them? |
|
| Author: | Tudwell [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
The King of Limbs is on par with The Bends, but all the albums in between are better. |
|
| Author: | Hang [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
Ok Computer Kid A = In Rainbows HttT = Amnesiac The Bends = TKoL Pablo Honey |
|
| Author: | pnoom [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
zephead8 wrote: woah pnoom is that based on the albums as they are or when you're done tinkering with them? Albums as they are. |
|
| Author: | zephead8 [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
ok ive never thought it fair in my own head to compare albums like the bends and king of limbs. literally the only similarity is that is made by the same band. two completely different monsters. |
|
| Author: | Dreww [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
I know some people on here already know about this, but it's pretty important to actually experience for yourself. http://puddlegum.net/radiohead-1010101010/ http://puddlegum.net/radiohead-01-and-10/ |
|
| Author: | Dreww [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
Nobody? |
|
| Author: | Cruz [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
Oh yeah, I remember reading through that stuff about a year ago (I think you posted it, actually, but referenced a different website). Fucking insane. I mean, what are the odds that that stuff was a coincidence? |
|
| Author: | Dreww [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
It's definitely not a coincidence. If you take the parallels seriously it reveals a whole lot about how the sign systems which tend to be used in the Radiohead-centric "music fan" contingent (which Pitchfork are obviously the unofficial curators of, though RYM reinforces it in its own brainwashed sheeple-like way) actually operate. The innate human desire for God-related transcendence is exploited through themes of postmodern alienation ("I wish that they'd swoop down in a country lane / Late at night when I'm driving / Take me on board their beautiful ship") but ten years later this is revealed to be a demonic, Faustian mistake ("I have no idea what I am talking about / I'm trapped in this body and can't get out"). The outerspace transcendence / netherworld entrapment binary pattern breaks the whole Radiohead discography wide open. And it can obviously be seen in other artists as well (most notably the two latest FlyLo albums). Against Demons tour. There are those who read binary and those who don't. |
|
| Author: | Cruz [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
How high are you right now? |
|
| Author: | joe c [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
|
|
|
| Author: | Dreww [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
Not at all! Subterranean Homesick Alien vs. Bodysnatchers. Are you kidding me? |
|
| Author: | rockvirtuoso [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Radiohead |
Dreww wrote: I know some people on here already know about this, but it's pretty important to actually experience for yourself. http://puddlegum.net/radiohead-1010101010/ http://puddlegum.net/radiohead-01-and-10/ appreciated. u legend |
|
| Page 41 of 68 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|