DDD Forum
https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/

Last Film You Saw And Rate It
https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=107
Page 762 of 934

Author:  PBR Streetgang [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 7:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

The Hateful Eight

I enjoyed watching it, went to see it in 70mm which was definitely worth it (although a two hour trip to the theatre in Amsterdam took a lot out of me). There was a great deal about this film that I liked. But also a quite some things that I didn't like. Mostly these are related to plot, which usually doesn't pose that big of a problem for me. But it seems to me that this is exactly what QT was going for with this movie, so it carries a little more weight than usual. Anyway, I only saw it yesterday and will watch it again for sure while I still can. Hopefully again on 70mm.

I definitely like it, and it was interesting to see Tarantino tackle a so classical a film, without him playing around with the form at every turn. It's kind of a relief to see him make a film reminiscent of Reservoir Dogs (and Jackie Brown iirc), where much of its content in terms of plotting and mise-en-scene isn't almost completely fueled by referentiality. This is of course not to say that The Hateful Eight isn't heavily indebted to westerns of the past, but it feels way more like a classic western with a classical structure and visual logic. Were it not for the liberties QT takes concerning violence and character morals that would not be possible in the 1950s, The Hateful Eight wouldn't feel like too much of an anachronism among films like Rio Bravo, Ride Lonesome or Seven Men from Now. I also really admire QT's determination to take more trouble than many other directors in fleshing out his characters, writing them to perfection and then take his sweet time about their dialogue in order to get the highest possible tension out of it, then pit characters against each other, have others form alliances in a way that the character configuration shifts and turns and you can't help but go along with the ride. Totally loved this.
Just about until the intermission. It seemed to me that after that point, QT no longer stuck to what he had been building up for quite some time (or at least not to that part of it I liked so much). Ant that's when the film's runtime began to strectch. Little by little, more and more until the end. VO-narration from the director bothered me (the first time in QT's films that I haven't loved his cameo), but most of all I found it ridiculous that he made us rewatch part of the scene. The change of perspective and new plot information was not interesting enough. I didn't like the sudden intrusion of Clue in the plot, felt like Agatha Christie Goes West all of a sudden. But most of all, I felt cheated when Tatum's character was introduced in the story. The flashback chapter that ensued after this felt entirely empty as it did not change anything about how I felt towards the characters or the plot. It reinforced my lack of interest in some aspects of the film (like for instance how completely unnecessary Joe Gage was in this film), introduced some annoying red herrings and in my understanding it was also this chapter - more than anything of what had occured in the first two hours of the film - that formed the basis for the final showdown. The end made me feel like all the careful plotting and suspense building QT had been doing prior to the flashback scene was all just for the sake of it.
So I'm not sure exactly what to make of all these mixed feelings I have. Maybe I need some input from other people who have liked this film? Because here is a movie that I'd love to love but atm cannot.
Dreww? Wanta? Clash? What say you? And Led, what were your reservations since you mentioned you had some? Anyone else?

Author:  ClashWho [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

Rudy Rules wrote:
ClashWho wrote:
pgm wrote:
I didn't see Selma either, but I suspect I will at some point.


Movie is weak. It deserved zero nominations.

Not even acting though? Actress who played Coretta killed it


I don't recall.

Author:  ClashWho [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

PBR Streetgang wrote:
The Hateful Eight

Just about until the intermission. It seemed to me that after that point, QT no longer stuck to what he had been building up for quite some time (or at least not to that part of it I liked so much). Ant that's when the film's runtime began to strectch. Little by little, more and more until the end. VO-narration from the director bothered me (the first time in QT's films that I haven't loved his cameo), but most of all I found it ridiculous that he made us rewatch part of the scene. The change of perspective and new plot information was not interesting enough. I didn't like the sudden intrusion of Clue in the plot, felt like Agatha Christie Goes West all of a sudden. But most of all, I felt cheated when Tatum's character was introduced in the story. The flashback chapter that ensued after this felt entirely empty as it did not change anything about how I felt towards the characters or the plot. It reinforced my lack of interest in some aspects of the film (like for instance how completely unnecessary Joe Gage was in this film), introduced some annoying red herrings and in my understanding it was also this chapter - more than anything of what had occured in the first two hours of the film - that formed the basis for the final showdown. The end made me feel like all the careful plotting and suspense building QT had been doing prior to the flashback scene was all just for the sake of it.
So I'm not sure exactly what to make of all these mixed feelings I have. Maybe I need some input from other people who have liked this film? Because here is a movie that I'd love to love but atm cannot.
Dreww? Wanta? Clash? What say you? And Led, what were your reservations since you mentioned you had some? Anyone else?


Well, I obviously enjoyed the ride immensely from beginning to end, but that's not to say that your criticisms are wrong or unsupported. I just don't share them. But this may interest you:

In the original script there was no narration and no rewatching of the same scene from a new angle to impart new information. Instead, characters just started vomiting blood out of nowhere. Now, that would have been an interesting choice in how to tell this story, and I wish I could see that version with a virgin mind so I could really know for sure if that would be better. But I can't. What I do know, however, is how thrilled I was when the intermission was over and QT's narration started up. I was absolutely enthralled and felt a warm glow of storytelling satisfaction when QT ended that narration with, "And that's why this chapter is called 'Daisy's Got a Secret.'" It kept me on the edge of my seat watching that coffee pot and seeing who would drink from it. It gave me that sinking sensation when John Ruth drank the coffee, and a squirming sense of anticipation wondering how quickly the poison would manifest itself. Is that better than John Ruth and OB suddenly projectile vomiting blood? That would certainly have been a great, shocking WTF moment. But it would rob me of those moments of squirming anticipation prior. It would rob me of that sinking sensation when John Ruth drinks the coffee. I'm not sure the gain is worth the loss. QT obviously decided the suspense gained by letting the audience in on the poison was more valuable than the shock moment of out-of-nowhere blood vomiting. I'm inclined to agree with him. And I didn't mind that it took an Agatha Christie turn, because I love QT's genre mash-ups and I thought this one really worked. It was already a bunch of nefarious characters locked in a room, so all it took was that slight nudge to push it into parlor room mystery territory.

Author:  ClashWho [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

Hey, Drewwp, I've added Buffalo '66 to my Netflix queue. Still waiting for Bone Tomahawk. They sent The Searchers instead. :confused:

Author:  Dreww [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

glad to hear it, Clash

(and also I agree with you about The Hateful Eight)

Author:  wantabodylikeme [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

Agathie Christie is awesome. And Joe Gage was a good background figure.

Author:  PBR Streetgang [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

wantabodylikeme wrote:
Agathie Christie is awesome.

Agreed.

wantabodylikeme wrote:
Joe Gage was a good background figure.

Not agreed.

I see what you mean, Clash. But the information about the coffee pot could have easily been given during the first time the scene played - just include that one shot in the sequence and bam. You'd have had all the same narrative info and get the same edge-of-seat effect, just without the VO. So as far as plot/drama/suspense is concerned, the replaying of the scene was not necessary. It's just the fact that I didn't really take to QT's intrusion. It was one of the rare cases where QT kinda failed to amuse me.

Author:  corrections [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

PBR Streetgang wrote:
The Hateful Eight

I enjoyed watching it, went to see it in 70mm which was definitely worth it (although a two hour trip to the theatre in Amsterdam took a lot out of me). There was a great deal about this film that I liked. But also a quite some things that I didn't like. Mostly these are related to plot, which usually doesn't pose that big of a problem for me. But it seems to me that this is exactly what QT was going for with this movie, so it carries a little more weight than usual. Anyway, I only saw it yesterday and will watch it again for sure while I still can. Hopefully again on 70mm.

I definitely like it, and it was interesting to see Tarantino tackle a so classical a film, without him playing around with the form at every turn. It's kind of a relief to see him make a film reminiscent of Reservoir Dogs (and Jackie Brown iirc), where much of its content in terms of plotting and mise-en-scene isn't almost completely fueled by referentiality. This is of course not to say that The Hateful Eight isn't heavily indebted to westerns of the past, but it feels way more like a classic western with a classical structure and visual logic. Were it not for the liberties QT takes concerning violence and character morals that would not be possible in the 1950s, The Hateful Eight wouldn't feel like too much of an anachronism among films like Rio Bravo, Ride Lonesome or Seven Men from Now. I also really admire QT's determination to take more trouble than many other directors in fleshing out his characters, writing them to perfection and then take his sweet time about their dialogue in order to get the highest possible tension out of it, then pit characters against each other, have others form alliances in a way that the character configuration shifts and turns and you can't help but go along with the ride. Totally loved this.
Just about until the intermission. It seemed to me that after that point, QT no longer stuck to what he had been building up for quite some time (or at least not to that part of it I liked so much). Ant that's when the film's runtime began to strectch. Little by little, more and more until the end. VO-narration from the director bothered me (the first time in QT's films that I haven't loved his cameo), but most of all I found it ridiculous that he made us rewatch part of the scene. The change of perspective and new plot information was not interesting enough. I didn't like the sudden intrusion of Clue in the plot, felt like Agatha Christie Goes West all of a sudden. But most of all, I felt cheated when Tatum's character was introduced in the story. The flashback chapter that ensued after this felt entirely empty as it did not change anything about how I felt towards the characters or the plot. It reinforced my lack of interest in some aspects of the film (like for instance how completely unnecessary Joe Gage was in this film), introduced some annoying red herrings and in my understanding it was also this chapter - more than anything of what had occured in the first two hours of the film - that formed the basis for the final showdown. The end made me feel like all the careful plotting and suspense building QT had been doing prior to the flashback scene was all just for the sake of it.
So I'm not sure exactly what to make of all these mixed feelings I have. Maybe I need some input from other people who have liked this film? Because here is a movie that I'd love to love but atm cannot.
Dreww? Wanta? Clash? What say you? And Led, what were your reservations since you mentioned you had some? Anyone else?


I liked the movie but had similar reservations as you. I did think the movie recovered itself in the end but the most powerful moments were before the flashback

Author:  Dreww [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

Quote:
But the information about the coffee pot could have easily been given during the first time the scene played - just include that one shot in the sequence and bam. You'd have had all the same narrative info and get the same edge-of-seat effect, just without the VO.

Nah, because that's not precisely the same chess-piece suspense Tarantino was going for. He wants to make sure you know that nobody saw her see it. If WE see her see it, there's the potential that someone else in the film saw her see it. And that's a different suspense than Tarantino wanted.

I'm not sure how much I can defend the voice-over other than that it instantly filled me with happiness and I wondered why Tarantino hadn't been doing this earlier. I love the idea of an intrusive narration out of nowhere in the middle of a film. Much preferable to like how PTA used narration at the beginning of Magnolia, which immediately popped into my head for some reason as other narration that seemed similarly weird (because the voice of the narrator is strange) but not as wanted (by me).

I also thought the replay of the same aspect of the scene but from the inside instead of out worked for small humorous reasons, like seeing Tim Roth light the candle as a finishing touch on making the setup appear inconspicuous. It reminded me of how the same candle worked so well on me earlier and had me thinking how much else could be setup in a similar way. Which is part of why the Channing Tatum surprise worked for me. So it has the effect of bringing your attention to the setup as constructed, and the film as constructed.

...Which is a big part of what the whole roadshow aspect, overture intermission, program, 70mm and all is about. Tarantino wants to reemphasize the made aspects of things, whether that's the made aspect of the situation, the writing itself, the direction itself, or the materials of industrial production.

I think this is also why you have that long take of Daisy with that Jack White or White Stripes song playing. In a way it's anachronistic, but like Tarantino, Jack White is famous for using old technology for new effect.

Author:  Dreww [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

also I think The Revenant is being underrated. I wasn't going to post this but after the Golden Globes a bunch of Inarritu hate is coming through again so here's my review. (Which is not to say I think it deserved to win)

Quote:
Yes it is a long and painful revenge movie with a shoestring "plot." But it is also a masterpiece of acting, production design, and cultural conception.

A lot of people say this gets boring and wearying after an hour or so but I found it completely thrilling, gripping, entertaining--pretty much every second up to the end. I found as it lost "action" steam it gained thematic weight. It is the truest kind of revisionist western in that it conserves some of the core "values" and tropes of American frontier stories--most notably the white man who in part knows "the ways" of the indigenous--while also foregrounding everything that was awful and left out about the way that period was usually mythologized by white men.

It should go without saying that this film really pushes your face into the blood, gut, and dirt extremely relentlessly but you should know that going in and not hold it against the film.

Part of me can understand why some people feel the film isn't satisfying in spite of its extremity, but I think this is part of the whole point of the film to not be completely satisfying in the obvious way so that it can be more deeply satisfying from a contemplative perspective. It's not just an easy application of acceptable "serious" aesthetics and gritty realism.

Perhaps most importantly I disagree with the people who imply that just because it is excruciating it is therefore a completely "materialist" film with just some tacked on spiritual elements. It is precisely because it rigorously and consistently taking the point of view of spirit-within-matter-and-beyond-matter that it refuses to be satisfying in a purely materialist, unallegorical, "gritty realist" way.

I think my little key to the map of this film without revealing too much would be to notice the breath as a symbolic element. Too often we only consider dialogue or images as having symbolic importance in films, but don't consider sound design, which is crucially important here as it always is with InĂ¡rritu. The use of breath in this film both visually and aurally is the ultimate purification of the sensibility of the film--it has the quality both of material but also of being a connection to and reflection of spirit. If you miss this, the film falls apart.

The one element I thought was a bit "try hard" was a certain twist on the majestic bison stampede.

Other than that, an absolutely breathtaking assault on the senses, worth of Lawrence of Arabia or whatever you've got.

Author:  wantabodylikeme [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

what's your top ten looking like these days now drew?

Author:  Dreww [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

1. Carol
2. Mad Max: Fury Road
3. Kumiko the Treasure Hunter
4. The Good Dinosaur
5. Sicario
6. The Hateful Eight
7. Inside Out
8. The Revenant
9. Queen of Earth
10. Ex Machina
11. Love & Mercy

did 11 since not everyone would count Kumiko as 2015

Author:  Led for your Head [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

My reservations regarding The Hateful Eight are mostly concerned with recency bias. Need to let it mellow out and probs watch it again before I place it somewhere within Tarantino's filmography.

Author:  ahawk [ Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

Million Dollar Baby
8.6/10

Raging Bull
9/10

Author:  PBR Streetgang [ Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Last Film You Saw And Rate It

Dreww wrote:
1. Carol
2. Mad Max: Fury Road
3. Kumiko the Treasure Hunter
4. The Good Dinosaur
5. Sicario
6. The Hateful Eight
7. Inside Out
8. The Revenant
9. Queen of Earth
10. Ex Machina
11. Love & Mercy


1/2. Sunset Song
1/2. Mad Max: Fury Road
3. Arabian Nights
4. Carol
5. The Assassin
6. Victoria
7. Son of Saul
8. Taxi
9. Sicario
10. Love

I think this is the end-of-year list with the least American movies I ever made. Still have a lot to see (Joy, The Revenant, Queen of Earth...)

Page 762 of 934 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/