| DDD Forum https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/ |
|
| MLB. https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=134 |
Page 128 of 338 |
| Author: | Led for your Head [ Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
CHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO |
|
| Author: | chicken sandwich [ Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
good trade for all teams, though it seems like the Diamondbacks got fleeced. |
|
| Author: | Paulie [ Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
Goddamnit Dayton Moore, goddamnit royals. Why not just keep Myers and sign Ed Jackson or some'n mane? |
|
| Author: | monga18 [ Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
kosherrock wrote: Yeah, with a much different approach. Aside from lincecum, how many bad contracts on the books? Zito and Lincecum are both signed for one more year at ~$22M. After them, the worst contract is probably Jeremy Affeldt's new deal (3y, $18M). But that's not what I was saying. The Dodgers are spending big not to emulate us but to annihilate us. |
|
| Author: | monga18 [ Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
Paulie wrote: Goddamnit Dayton Moore, goddamnit royals. Why not just keep Myers and sign Ed Jackson or some'n mane? because Jeff Francoeur is the future and the past, the alpha and the omega The almost more amazing thing is that Billy Beane turned down a trade of Brett Anderson for Myers (though I suppose the A's have an outfield glut). |
|
| Author: | Paulie [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
Thanks to the bad ass gift chemo Ali got me, I now know that Anthony gose went first to third on singles 7/8 times- small as hell sample but a ridic high %- and was +24 base runner in just 189 PAs/56 times on base. |
|
| Author: | Chemical Ali [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
Damn, i didn't know it was that exact |
|
| Author: | lonewolf371 [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
Anyone else think the Angles spent too much on Hamilton? |
|
| Author: | monga18 [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
Power hitters are expensive. I thought he'd get another year or two from somebody, tbh. He probably won't be worth the contract by year 5 but it's not nearly as ridiculous as Pujols' deal. |
|
| Author: | corrections [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
monga18 wrote: Power hitters are expensive. I thought he'd get another year or two from somebody, tbh. He probably won't be worth the contract by year 5 but it's not nearly as ridiculous as Pujols' deal. As someone who is pretty intimately familiar with Hamilton's time here let me sound a small note of dissent on that. First, his hitting value in left is signficantly less than what it is in Center. Additionally, he's one of the most high varience players out there and has a terrible approach (things that unlike Pujols consistent ability to get on base) will hurt his long term value even more. His body is not in peak condition and we don't know if he'll have a relapse away from his safer environment and accountability. So I'd say it's worse than Pujols contract in that sense but with the 5 years being shorter probably around the same. |
|
| Author: | pgm [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
lonewolf371 wrote: Anyone else think the Angles spent too much on Hamilton? Too many years, but not too much money. I think it was a good pickup, overall. I wish the Phillies got him (although, I wouldn't have give him 5 years, so it would have been impossible). |
|
| Author: | lonewolf371 [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
What's the going rate for a WAR now? $5 million? Hamilton is not a 5-WAR player; he's only cracked it once. |
|
| Author: | corrections [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
lonewolf371 wrote: What's the going rate for a WAR now? $5 million? Hamilton is not a 5-WAR player; he's only cracked it once. Rate's about to go way up with the new TV deal so you have to account for inflation. I suspect it will move into the 6 million range at least. |
|
| Author: | lonewolf371 [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
corrections wrote: Rate's about to go way up with the new TV deal so you have to account for inflation. I suspect it will move into the 6 million range at least. That's true, but there's also age regression on the part of Hamilton. |
|
| Author: | corrections [ Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MLB. |
lonewolf371 wrote: corrections wrote: Rate's about to go way up with the new TV deal so you have to account for inflation. I suspect it will move into the 6 million range at least. That's true, but there's also age regression on the part of Hamilton. Oh of course. And bad batting eye. |
|
| Page 128 of 338 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|