| DDD Forum https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/ |
|
| Tennis. https://digitaldreamdoor.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=140 |
Page 86 of 117 |
| Author: | Tudwell [ Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Also, part of the reason I revisit those Rosol highlights is that it's simply one of the best matches anyone's ever played, ever. That fifth set was as close to perfect as a tennis player can get. |
|
| Author: | Nick [ Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Tudwell wrote: Nick wrote: Tudwell wrote: Yousha wrote: NEVER watch a match which Rafa lost. A far bigger fan of his than anything else in sport, probably even the bangladesh cricket team. Interesting. I find myself often returning to highlights of his losses, e.g. against Soderling at the French or Rosol at Wimbledon. Never fails to cheer me up. What's your beef with Nadal, Tudster? Pretty much everything. His strokes are offensive to the eye. His grunting is offensive to the ear. He's always scowling across the net, making excuses, complaining to the umpire about something or other. I think it all started because I fell in love with Federer so quickly when I got into tennis and it just flowed naturally into hating Nadal, but now I simply enjoy rooting against him. He's really the only player I actively dislike on tour. I used to hate Murray too (now don't get me started on his whining), but he won me over a bit when he fell just short of the mark so much and when he hooked up with Lendl and got more aggressive. I actually think Fed complains to the umpire a fair amount when he's under pressure too. |
|
| Author: | Tudwell [ Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Nick wrote: Tudwell wrote: Nick wrote: What's your beef with Nadal, Tudster? Pretty much everything. His strokes are offensive to the eye. His grunting is offensive to the ear. He's always scowling across the net, making excuses, complaining to the umpire about something or other. I think it all started because I fell in love with Federer so quickly when I got into tennis and it just flowed naturally into hating Nadal, but now I simply enjoy rooting against him. He's really the only player I actively dislike on tour. I used to hate Murray too (now don't get me started on his whining), but he won me over a bit when he fell just short of the mark so much and when he hooked up with Lendl and got more aggressive. I actually think Fed complains to the umpire a fair amount when he's under pressure too. Yeah, he does sometimes, and it's annoying. But he makes up for it with his gorgeous tennis. |
|
| Author: | Cruz [ Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Tudwell wrote: Cruz wrote: You other tennis nerds should check out this youtube channel called Tennis Speed. Mostly there're videos of top players hitting strokes in super slow motion. Interesting stuff: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aip2Zot_xq8[/youtube] I don't get how Djokovic has the takeback he does, turning the racquet face completely behind him, and still play at the pace of professional tennis. I know other players have a lot bigger swings, but I don't understand theirs either. I guess they prepare really early? He has extremely early preparation, even for a professional. You can see in that video how long we waits with his racquet at the very back of his backswing, compared to Fed and Nadal who barely pause there, if it all. Beside that, it really doesn't take much extra time to turn one's wrist the opposite direction. Marat Safin had a similar technique on his forehand, as did Carlos Moya. Players like Nadal, Hewitt, and Del Petro have forehand swings that take much longer to execute (because of their overall range of motion) than Djokovic. Some players with short backswings that come to mind are Agassi, Blake, and the Bryan Brothers. Most doubles specialists play with much more compact strokes than singles players because of the drastically reduced reaction time when playing against net players and also the premium that is placed on aggressive serve return. |
|
| Author: | Yousha [ Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Part of the reason why I support Nadal is cause he was the solution to Federer, but over time, I started rooting for him cause he really should not be winning with the technique he has, it's almost like a farmer playing a game so technical. Yet, he manages to win and overcome odds. There's just about nothing elegant about him, heck, I liked him when he had the capri pants and sleeveless shirts and beard even better, it was the perfect fuck you to federer's sleek oiled hair and polo shirts. Idiot had to clean up after he became number one, but I'd already become a fan by then. |
|
| Author: | George [ Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
| Author: | Tudwell [ Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Cruz wrote: He has extremely early preparation, even for a professional. You can see in that video how long we waits with his racquet at the very back of his backswing, compared to Fed and Nadal who barely pause there, if it all. Beside that, it really doesn't take much extra time to turn one's wrist the opposite direction. Marat Safin had a similar technique on his forehand, as did Carlos Moya. My favorite forehand with that technique: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lR92UVCZV0[/youtube] |
|
| Author: | Cruz [ Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Yeah, Gonzalez had just a beast of a forehand when he was on. The length of his swing, though, I think contributed to his groundstrokes not being terribly consistent over the long-term. I think he is also a little impatient by nature, which is why he worked so well under (the extremely underrated) Larry Stefanki, who preached a more patient, opportunistic game style. |
|
| Author: | Tudwell [ Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 46488.html Take that, Yousha. |
|
| Author: | Yousha [ Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Tudwell wrote: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/j-m-coetzee-opens-up-about-his-life-in-letters-to-paul-auster-8546488.html Take that, Yousha. Thank you, I did enjoy that immensely. |
|
| Author: | George [ Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Quote: Coetzee describes Federer’s best tennis as “something like the human ideal made visible” and says the experience of watching him play is “very much like my response to masterworks of art”. amen... the very reason he is my favorite tennis player (and why fabrice santoro is up there for me, as well). there is little that is aesthetically pleasing about rafa's and djoko's games, though at their best they're as effective as roger at his.
|
|
| Author: | Yousha [ Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Tommy Haas beating Djokovic leaves me in no doubt that he'd have been an absolute legend if he was a player in the 80s and if he was fit. By legend, I mean over 5 Slams. |
|
| Author: | Tudwell [ Wed Mar 27, 2013 2:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Yeah, he was very unfortunate with his injuries. I think his game also just tends to bother Djokovic, who's 4-3 against him now. I remember when Haas beat Djokovic at back-to-back tournies in 2009. It's nice to see him still having success at nearly 35 (like, he turns 35 in a week or so, I think). |
|
| Author: | MintCondition [ Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
Yeah Haas plays with a lot of variety and that can bother Djokovic if executed well. I hope he can keep winning. In this form he'd be a definite threat at Wimbledon...or at least a potential banana peel for any of the top guys. |
|
| Author: | corrections [ Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tennis. |
George wrote: Quote: Coetzee describes Federer’s best tennis as “something like the human ideal made visible” and says the experience of watching him play is “very much like my response to masterworks of art”. amen... the very reason he is my favorite tennis player (and why fabrice santoro is up there for me, as well). there is little that is aesthetically pleasing about rafa's and djoko's games, though at their best they're as effective as roger at his.Same for me and Federer. |
|
| Page 86 of 117 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|