It is currently Fri May 17, 2024 1:39 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7424 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349 ... 495  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:27 pm 
Offline
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 2168
Location: Fairfax, VA
corrections wrote:
joe c wrote:
Where do y'all think Alex Smith fits in on a QB Ranking list? He's definitely above the Dalton line, but just how high is he?


Not very much higher. Below is my list of QBs playing or likely to play broken up by tiers

Top of the Elite
1(a). Rodgers
1(b). Manning (situation dependent between these two)
3. Brees

Elite
4. Rivers
5. Brady
6. Matt Ryan
7. Luck
8. Big Ben
9. Wilson

Good to Great QBs
10. Romo
11. Foles
12. Manning
13. Cutler
14. Stafford
15. Cam Newton

Above Average QBs
16. Kapernick
17. Joe Flacco

Average QBs
18. Alex Smith
19. Andy Dalton
20. Brian Hoyer
21. Carson Palmer
22. Ryan Tannehill
23. Kyle Orton

Below Average
24. Michael Vick
25. Kirk Cousins
26. Austin Davis

Bad QBs
27. Geno Smith
28. Matt Schaub
29. Fitzpatrick
30. Stephen Hill
31. EJ Manuel
32. Josh McCown
33. Chad Henne

Terrible (non-professional division) QBs
34. Jake Locker
35. Drew Stanton
36. Charlie Whitehurst
37. Christian Ponder
38. Matt McGloin

Rookie (too early to tell)
N/R Bridgewater
N/R Bortles
N/R Derek Carr


Only notable changes I'd make are:

Palmer > Hoyer
Dalton > Noodle Arm Alex Smith, and both could possibly move into the above average category.
Eli Manning is in the right category, but should be below every other guy in that category. He's certainly worse than Cutler and Stafford.

Brady's placement is hard to say. The way he's playing now and the way he played most of last year, he's not deserving of a top 5 spot. But not having Brady top 5 in the league seems wrong. Plus his failures are likely a result of his garbage receivers and garbage O-line.

Also who the fuck is Stephen Hill... isn't he a Jets receiver? Did you mean Shaun Hill?...

You omitted Mike Glennon as well, not that he really matters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:07 am
Posts: 7010
thejew wrote:
Brady's placement is hard to say. The way he's playing now and the way he played most of last year, he's not deserving of a top 5 spot. But not having Brady top 5 in the league seems wrong. Plus his failures are likely a result of his garbage receivers and garbage O-line.

Brady started having a lot of problems with accuracy last year. This year they've been compounded by the horrible offense around him, but he's still been off on a lot of throws and a lot of bad plays have been his fault. Being accurate under pressure is part of being a QB, and he's horrible at it.

I would probably put Luck at #5 and move Wilson ahead of Big Ben. Foles I would put down after Newton because he's not reliably accurate and is a little bitch in the pocket. I can't think of one QB who is more a product of his system. Also Flacco>Kaep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:26 pm
Posts: 4258
Location: Ohio
Whoa. Nothing non professional here

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:27 pm 
Offline
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 2168
Location: Fairfax, VA
Eric J wrote:
thejew wrote:
Brady's placement is hard to say. The way he's playing now and the way he played most of last year, he's not deserving of a top 5 spot. But not having Brady top 5 in the league seems wrong. Plus his failures are likely a result of his garbage receivers and garbage O-line.

Brady started having a lot of problems with accuracy last year. This year they've been compounded by the horrible offense around him, but he's still been off on a lot of throws and a lot of bad plays have been his fault. Being accurate under pressure is part of being a QB, and he's horrible at it.

I would probably put Luck at #5 and move Wilson ahead of Big Ben. Foles I would put down after Newton because he's not reliably accurate and is a little bitch in the pocket. I can't think of one QB who is more a product of his system. Also Flacco>Kaep.


Agreed with Brady, but nah Ryan > Luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:42 pm
Posts: 4629
I wonder what Andrew Luck would do in the Coryell with two freaks like Jones and White


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 2168
Location: Fairfax, VA
Paulie wrote:
I wonder what Andrew Luck would do in the Coryell with two freaks like Jones and White


I'm doubting Andrew Luck could've been as efficient as Ryan was last year, when he threw ~4,700 yards with no Jones and a one-legged White. Although Luck is having a tremendous season thus far.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:42 pm
Posts: 4629
Luck was basically already as efficient as Ryan last year, qb rating and Y/A was almost the same, int% was better. And this is without Reggie Wayne and Dwayne Allen for most of the season. That meanns T.Y. Hilton was his top receiver, compared to Julio Jones. Oh and he's just now in his third/age 25 season; take a look at the jump Ryan made at this point in his career, and consider that Luck is already better than Ryan was at this age.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:09 am
Posts: 5537
Location: Shoulder the sky, my lad, and drink your ale
Crx, where would you put rg3 on that list?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:04 pm 
Offline
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 2168
Location: Fairfax, VA
Paulie wrote:
Luck was basically already as efficient as Ryan last year, qb rating and Y/A was almost the same, int% was better. And this is without Reggie Wayne and Dwayne Allen for most of the season. That meanns T.Y. Hilton was his top receiver, compared to Julio Jones. Oh and he's just now in his third/age 25 season; take a look at the jump Ryan made at this point in his career, and consider that Luck is already better than Ryan was at this age.


To my knowledge we were ranking QBs based on what they've actually done on the field and are doing on the field, not potential. Yeah, Luck will surpass Ryan especially with the upwards trajectory his career is taking. But Ryan is the better QB right now (unless Luck sustains this unreal pace that he's currently playing it, which is unlikely).

Also, no Dwayne Allen isn't really that big of a loss... he's a pretty average tight end. Julio + a Gimped and Useless White is a much bigger loss than a 37 year old Reggie Wayne and an average TE.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 2:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:07 am
Posts: 7010
ignatious wrote:
Crx, where would you put rg3 on that list?


Bones wrote:
I'd personally put him in the above average tier right above Kaepernick.

Oh God no. On Crx's list I would have him either right behind Tannehill, or right in front of Cousins. And that's even potentially generous. Never in his life was RGIII asked to make more than one read on a given play before last season, and last season he was terrible. I assume if he hadn't gotten hurt he'd be better this season, but given Gruden's apparent joy that he got hurt, I'm not so sure that's true. He's like a less athletic (because of injuries) version of a young Mike Vick, or a less smart version of an old Mike Vick, and neither of those options are gonna win many games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 5:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:07 am
Posts: 7010
The difficulty grading Griffin is that he had a memorable rookie season that was never gonna be repeatable, in terms of how he accomplished his success. Then we don't really know how much of last year was him being injured, or him just not being good without the zone-read working to perfection anymore. He only got to play one game this year but he wasn't very good at all, and most reports said he was struggling a lot in camp.

Kaep maintained his good TD/INT ratio last year, and if you take away the Bears game he's done the same this year. The running game and O-line are both among the best in the league but the same could be said for Wilson. I've also seen him play extremely well in the clutch and has shown the potential to consistently read through his progressions. I agree Kaep's not very much above average, which is why I said Flacco>Kaep, but RGIII hasn't shown the ability to "process information quickly," which according to Bill Walsh is 95% of the position, and historically speaking no one who never had to do it in college ever mastered it in the NFL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 5:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:07 am
Posts: 7010
thejew wrote:
Eric J wrote:
thejew wrote:
Brady's placement is hard to say. The way he's playing now and the way he played most of last year, he's not deserving of a top 5 spot. But not having Brady top 5 in the league seems wrong. Plus his failures are likely a result of his garbage receivers and garbage O-line.

Brady started having a lot of problems with accuracy last year. This year they've been compounded by the horrible offense around him, but he's still been off on a lot of throws and a lot of bad plays have been his fault. Being accurate under pressure is part of being a QB, and he's horrible at it.

I would probably put Luck at #5 and move Wilson ahead of Big Ben. Foles I would put down after Newton because he's not reliably accurate and is a little bitch in the pocket. I can't think of one QB who is more a product of his system. Also Flacco>Kaep.


Agreed with Brady, but nah Ryan > Luck.

Maybe you can't rank Luck ahead of him yet, but I think Luck's a better quarterback at this point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 5:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:07 am
Posts: 7010
Bones wrote:
Tough to choose. Luck has had a worse offensive line while the Falcons have had a worse defense.

This would actually bad a QBs statistics more than anything; you spend more time throwing to catch up, often against vanilla defenses. Pressure disrupts a QB more than anything, and how similar their stats are with that sack differential says a lot of amazing things about Luck. The dude's just a cyborg.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:07 am
Posts: 7010
*meant "pad," not "bad a QB's stats..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NFL.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 7:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:07 am
Posts: 7010
Chi
Car

Hou
Dal

Buf
Det

Bal
Indy

Pit
Jax

TB
NO

Atl
NYG

Stl
Phi

Cle
Ten

Ari
Den

NYJ
Sd

KC
SF

Cin
NE

Sea
Wash


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7424 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349 ... 495  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

DigitalDreamDoor Forum is one part of a music and movie list website whose owner has given its visitors
the privilege to discuss music and movies, and has no control and cannot in any way be held liable over
how, or by whom this board is used. If you read or see anything inappropriate that has been posted,
contact webmaster@digitaldreamdoor.com. Comments in the forum are reviewed before list updates.
Topics include rock music, metal, rap, hip-hop, blues, jazz, songs, albums, guitar, drums, musicians, and more.


DDD Home Page | DDD Music Lists Page | DDD Movie Lists Page

Privacy Policy