Re: Greatest Rock Artists Of All Time (Revision Version)
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2026 11:37 pm
Fair enough. Good job on the top 20 update.
The DigitalDreamDoor Forum is where you can comment to improve music, movie, and other lists in digitaldreamdoor.com. Welcome
https://digitaldreamdoor.com/phpBB3/
If in acclaim, acclaim by the artist's peers is part of what's being considered, then I'd say in that part of acclaim, it's Ray > Beach Boys > Zep. Ray was widely viewed as a genius, and Pet Sounds was very big with musicians.ManPerson wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 8:44 pm A lot to unpack here, let's see...
I saw them as pretty close overall, with Zep's popularity win being the most decisive, though it's hard to compare them in that regard due to how album-focused Zep were.Tim wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 9:09 am Also I can see Ray and Beach Boys over Zep. Would say Beach Boys' influence is more fundamental than Zep's, same goes for Ray.
If I had to rank them I'd say
Influence:
Ray > Beach Boys >= Zep
Ray's definitely number one here, imo, but all three are fairly close.
Acclaim:
I don't see a clear winner or loser here
Popularity:
Zep > Beach Boys > Ray
Since influence is the most important criteria I guess I'm fine with Ray > Beach Boys > Zep
I figure he's a bit lacking in lasting popularity compared to some others in this range, though I probably underrated his initial popularity a tad. I could see him moving up a couple spots but I actually think Gaye clearly takes both popularity (especially lasting) and acclaim over him. I could be convinced otherwise, though.Brian wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 11:53 am
I think Fats Domino is being underrated in the recent posts. Moving MJ and Madonna ahead of him is fine, but I don't know if I'd move anyone else ahead of him. He was the most popular rock artist of the '50s except for Elvis. He doesn't have a weak area in the criteria. Some of the artists who are close to his equals overall might beat him in acclaim, but I think not by enough to make up for his strength in the rest of the criteria.
Agreed on AM, and also, because their overall list is based on a calculation based on both albums and songs, the result is a bias in favor of album artists, because singles artists do poorly in albums, but everyone, including album artists, has songs. So would consider the AM ranking in a limited way, and to the extent that it is a factor, I think the songs artists list is better than the overall artists list.ManPerson wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 9:38 pm I figure AM has a pretty strong bias against r&b and hip hop, though. Acclaim is definitely somewhat close but I still think Marvin takes it as I think him, Prince and Stevie are probably the most respected r&b recording artists in some order.
I think Madonna takes both influence and cultural impact, but I agree on musical impact/acclaim. Even going by critical acclaim, Thriller was the 1983 Pazz & Jop album of the year, and has continued to be highly acclaimed since then. I don't see anything by Madonna equaling that. Also, MJ's 3 most acclaimed songs are more acclaimed than any Madonna song. I see the amount of acclaimed music as a consideration, but to put Madonna ahead of MJ in acclaim on those grounds seems like making quantity too big a consideration.Fido wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:20 am I think Madonna over MJ is crazy. Michael Jackson during his peak was probably the most famous person in the world bar none. There wasn't a point during their whole careers when Madonna was more popular than MJ, and they were contemporaries. I don't think she wins a single criterion honestly, only arguably cultural impact. I guess the notion of her being more acclaimed comes from ditching Musical Impact in favour of Critical Acclaim and going with AcclaimedMusic, something I disagree with as that artists list is not useful at all, esp when comparing an artist that has continued to make music with a dead one. Michael was also acclaimed as one of the best singers and dancers in the world, Madonna has nothing comparable to that.
If being a highly regarded singer and dancer was all that defined acclaim, then Chris Brown would be ahead of Boh Dylan. Madonna pretty much redefined what it meant to be a female pop star and has entire college classes dedicated to her cultural impact. She also had a hand in popularizing all sorts of dance/electronic styles across the 80s and 90s. I think Jackson's recognition is definitely larger (most famous person in the world and all that), but in terms of who was more of a paradigm shift for pop music and culture, I'd say Madonna.Fido wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:20 am I think Madonna over MJ is crazy. Michael Jackson during his peak was probably the most famous person in the world bar none. There wasn't a point during their whole careers when Madonna was more popular than MJ, and they were contemporaries. I don't think she wins a single criterion honestly, only arguably cultural impact. I guess the notion of her being more acclaimed comes from ditching Musical Impact in favour of Critical Acclaim and going with AcclaimedMusic, something I disagree with as that artists list is not useful at all, esp when comparing an artist that has continued to make music with a dead one. Michael was also acclaimed as one of the best singers and dancers in the world, Madonna has nothing comparable to that.
I figured Zep takes critical acclaim over BB and Charles while they both take acclaim with other musicians resulting in an overall tie. I'll note that I think Zep are the most acclaimed live act of the three as well. I moved them both ahead of Zep so I guess it's kind of a moot point.Brian wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 1:03 pmIf in acclaim, acclaim by the artist's peers is part of what's being considered, then I'd say in that part of acclaim, it's Ray > Beach Boys > Zep. Ray was widely viewed as a genius, and Pet Sounds was very big with musicians.ManPerson wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 8:44 pm A lot to unpack here, let's see...
I saw them as pretty close overall, with Zep's popularity win being the most decisive, though it's hard to compare them in that regard due to how album-focused Zep were.Tim wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 9:09 am Also I can see Ray and Beach Boys over Zep. Would say Beach Boys' influence is more fundamental than Zep's, same goes for Ray.
If I had to rank them I'd say
Influence:
Ray > Beach Boys >= Zep
Ray's definitely number one here, imo, but all three are fairly close.
Acclaim:
I don't see a clear winner or loser here
Popularity:
Zep > Beach Boys > Ray
Since influence is the most important criteria I guess I'm fine with Ray > Beach Boys > Zep
I figure he's a bit lacking in lasting popularity compared to some others in this range, though I probably underrated his initial popularity a tad. I could see him moving up a couple spots but I actually think Gaye clearly takes both popularity (especially lasting) and acclaim over him. I could be convinced otherwise, though.Brian wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 11:53 am
I think Fats Domino is being underrated in the recent posts. Moving MJ and Madonna ahead of him is fine, but I don't know if I'd move anyone else ahead of him. He was the most popular rock artist of the '50s except for Elvis. He doesn't have a weak area in the criteria. Some of the artists who are close to his equals overall might beat him in acclaim, but I think not by enough to make up for his strength in the rest of the criteria.
Comparisons in lasting popularity are tricky with musicians of different eras. If we're comparing the current popularity of, say, Fats Domino vs. Prince, that's a comparison of Domino's popularity 70 years later vs. Prince's popularity 40 years later. So as hard as it is, lasting popularity ideally is considered in a way that doesn't discriminate against the earlier artist. I'm not saying that you're doing that, I'm just making a point to keep in mind.
Fwiw, I look at AM's song and albums list separately to adjust for that bias.Brian wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 1:08 pmAgreed on AM, and also, because their overall list is based on a calculation based on both albums and songs, the result is a bias in favor of album artists, because singles artists do poorly in albums, but everyone, including album artists, has songs. So would consider the AM ranking in a limited way, and to the extent that it is a factor, I think the songs artists list is better than the overall artists list.ManPerson wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 9:38 pm I figure AM has a pretty strong bias against r&b and hip hop, though. Acclaim is definitely somewhat close but I still think Marvin takes it as I think him, Prince and Stevie are probably the most respected r&b recording artists in some order.
I'm not sure about this, I think Like a Prayer is probably more acclaimed than DSTYGE and Beat It, maybe Into the Groove and Like a Virgin as well.Brian wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 1:18 pmI think Madonna takes both influence and cultural impact, but I agree on musical impact/acclaim. Even going by critical acclaim, Thriller was the 1983 Pazz & Jop album of the year, and has continued to be highly acclaimed since then. I don't see anything by Madonna equaling that. Also, MJ's 3 most acclaimed songs are more acclaimed than any Madonna song. I see the amount of acclaimed music as a consideration, but to put Madonna ahead of MJ in acclaim on those grounds seems like making quantity too big a consideration.Fido wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:20 am I think Madonna over MJ is crazy. Michael Jackson during his peak was probably the most famous person in the world bar none. There wasn't a point during their whole careers when Madonna was more popular than MJ, and they were contemporaries. I don't think she wins a single criterion honestly, only arguably cultural impact. I guess the notion of her being more acclaimed comes from ditching Musical Impact in favour of Critical Acclaim and going with AcclaimedMusic, something I disagree with as that artists list is not useful at all, esp when comparing an artist that has continued to make music with a dead one. Michael was also acclaimed as one of the best singers and dancers in the world, Madonna has nothing comparable to that.
If we want to adjust by era for lasting popularity, I'd say Gaye and Domino's primes were about 15 years apart, give or take and I think it's pretty safe in saying that Gaye is a lot more popular in 2026 than Domino was in 2011.Tim wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 2:06 pm Fats v Hendrix
Influence (incl. Cultural): Hendrix but Fats is also very influential, culturally as well
Popularity: Initial Fats, lasting Hendrix but as Brian said, not apples to oranges comparison, singles artist v albums, distinct eras as well
Acclaim: Hendrix is prolly the most acclaimed instrumentalist in rock so he takes it, I think
Fats v Gaye
Influence (incl. Cultural): Fats
Popularity: By raw numbers Gaye, but you could argue Fats was more popular in context of the 1950s rock music than Gaye was in context of the 1960-70s rock music
Acclaim: Gaye