Fido wrote: Wed Jul 15, 2026 6:36 am
The wah-wah effect was not new when Voodoo Child was released, see Clapton on Tales of Brave Ulysses or White Room for example. Purple Haze's quirky, dissonant, distorted riff and then the Hendrix chord were much more influential, not to mention his biggest hit at the time.
I think that's a fair point, and I believe that "Purple Haze" has the stronger argument when it comes to pure innovation specifically. As you pointed out, the dissonant riff, the Hendrix chord, and the overall sound were groundbreaking, and I wouldn't argue that "Voodoo Child" was more revolutionary in that sense. I also agree that its wah-wah isn't really the reason to give it the edge, since, yes, that was already being explored by other players.
Where I lean toward "Voodoo Child" is more in terms of the type of influence it had. From what I've gathered, "Purple Haze" was more about expanding the possibilities of what the electric guitar could do--the tone, the harmony, the use of effects, and the idea that a riff could be unconventional. Still, my impression is that "Voodoo Child" had a more direct influence on later rock guitarists in terms of riff construction: combining blues licks with crushingly heavy distortion, aggressive rhythmic attack, and using the guitar figure itself as a more central driving force of the song. I think most disciples of Hendrix would convey that the approach on "Voodoo Child" became a more important part of the actual language of hard rock and blues-rock guitar.
That said, I think "Purple Haze" probably has the edge in popularity and iconic status. It was a bigger cultural moment and its opening riff is one of the most recognizable guitar figures. My distinction here is that I'm trying to separate the broader fame of the song and Hendrix's overall legacy from the specific historical impact of the riff itself.
So I don't think "Voodoo Child" wins because it's ahead in every category. "Purple Haze" probably has the stronger case for innovation and iconic status, while "Voodoo Child" has the stronger argument in terms of acclaim among guitarists and the specific type of influence it had on later guitar playing. That's why I ended up giving it the slight edge, although I think either choice is ultimately defensible, to be honest.