300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Moderator: pauldrach

Tim
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:23 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Tim »

Maybe Fellini/Godard > Buñuel as well? I'd give Buñuel influence over either (narrowly so over Godard) but probably not acclaim or body of work.
User avatar
ManPerson
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:57 pm
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by ManPerson »

Interesting comparison. Let's see...

Acclaim:
All three are widely regarded as masters of cinema, though Fellini and Godard's reputations do seem to be a bit greater than Bunuel's.

Influence:
Fellini is definitely the least influential here (though still does very well in this category). Bunuel influence mainly lies in his pioneering works in surrealist and experimental cinema while Godard's influence lies in Breathless's upheaval of cinematic conventions up to that point and helping to kickstart the french new wave. I might even lean towards Godard > Bunuel here, but it's very close.

Body of Work:
Here are each director's placements on our decade and all time lists, which should give a solid idea of the strength of their filmographies.

Bunuel
All Time List:
Un Chien Andalou #119
Viridiana #292
L'age D'or #343
Los Olvidados #360
Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie #444
Belle De Jour #455

1920s:
Un Chien Andalou #11

1930s:
L'age D'or #30
Land Without Bread #173

1950s:
Los Olvidados #48
Nazarin #234

1960s:
Viridiana #45
Belle De Jour #63
The Exterminating Angel #86
Simon of the Desert #240

1970s:
The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie #58
That Obscure Object of Desire #88
Tristana #100
The Phantom of Liberty #145

Godard
All Time List:
Breathless #23
Contempt #252
Pierrot Le Fou #399

1960s:
Breathless #4
Contempt #38
Pierrot Le Fou #57
Vivre Sa Vie #89
Alphaville #92
Week-end #96
Bande a Part #114
Masculin Feminin #161

Fellini
All Time List:
8 1/2 #36
La Dolce Vita #73
La Strada #122
Amarcord #404
Nights of Cabiria #416

1950s:
La Strada #22
Nights of Cabiria #55
I Vitelloni #74

1960s:
8 1/2 #7
La Dolce Vita #13
Satyricon #149
Juliet of the Spirits #166

1970s:
Amarcord #55

Based on this I'd say Fellini/Bunuel > Godard, but all 3 are fairly close

So...
Bunuel vs Godard
Acclaim: Godard
Influence: close
Body of Work: Bunuel

Bunuel vs Fellini
Acclaim: Fellini
Influence: Bunuel
Body of Work: close
I think Bunuel's win in influence is slightly bigger than Fellini's in acclaim

So overall, maybe...
12. Godard
13. Bunuel
14. Fellini
Last edited by ManPerson on Sun Dec 21, 2025 7:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
pauldrach
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:44 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by pauldrach »

At first glance, most of these breakdowns seem to make sense but I won't have the time to really look into this before Christmas. I have the biggest doubts concerning Chaplin vs. Ford.
User avatar
Dubrow555
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2024 8:04 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Dubrow555 »

I'm on board with Scorsese/Lynch/Miyazaki being higher
User avatar
pauldrach
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:44 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by pauldrach »

RIP Béla Tarr
User avatar
Zach
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2024 2:22 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Zach »

Just saw that. Damn.
Tim
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:23 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Tim »

ManPerson wrote: Sat Dec 20, 2025 7:56 pm So, basically, I'm suggesting

1. Alfred Hitchcock
2. Charles Chaplin
3. John Ford
4. Akira Kurosawa
5. D.W. Griffith
6. Sergei M. Eisenstein
7. Orson Welles
8. Stanley Kubrick
9. Jean Renoir
10. Georges Méliès
11. Fritz Lang
12. Jean-Luc Godard
13. Luis Buñuel
14. Federico Fellini
15. F.W. Murnau
16. Ingmar Bergman
17. Carl Theodor Dreyer
18. Howard Hawks
19. Yasujirō Ozu
20. Martin Scorsese
21. Robert Bresson
22. François Truffaut
23. Cecil B. DeMille
24. Satyajit Ray
25. Steven Spielberg
26. Andrei Tarkovsky
27. Ernst Lubitsch
28. Michelangelo Antonioni
29. John Cassavetes
30. Billy Wilder
31. Buster Keaton
32. Roberto Rossellini
33. Kenji Mizoguchi
34. David Lynch
35. Woody Allen
36. Robert Altman
37. David Lean
38. Hayao Miyazaki
39. Erich von Stroheim
40. Abbas Kiarostami
41. Dziga Vertov
42. James Cameron
43. Frank Capra
44. Roman Polanski
45. Luchino Visconti
46. Sergio Leone
47. Stanley Donen
48. Werner Herzog
49. Michael Powell (& Emeric Pressburger)
50. Quentin Tarantino
51. Joel & Ethan Coen
52. Francis Ford Coppola
53. Robert J. Flaherty
54. Jean Vigo
55. Spike Lee
56. Raoul Walsh
57. Bernardo Bertolucci
58. Ridley Scott
59. Vittorio De Sica
60. Douglas Sirk
61. Victor Sjöström
62. Alexander Dovzhenko
63. Paul Thomas Anderson
64. Wong Kar-Wai
65. John Carpenter
66. Sam Peckinpah
67. Nicholas Ray
68. Mario Bava
69. Josef von Sternberg
70. Rainer Werner Fassbinder
71. Jean-Pierre Melville
72. Max Ophüls
73. Christopher Nolan
74. Wes Anderson
75. Sidney Lumet
76. George A. Romero
77. Maurice Tourneur
78. Busby Berkeley
79. David Cronenberg
80. Jean Cocteau
81. John Huston
82. Wim Wenders
83. Samuel Fuller
84. Krzysztof Kieślowski
85. Louis Feuillade
86. Terrence Malick
87. Edwin S. Porter
88. Chantal Akerman
89. Alain Resnais
90. Michael Curtiz
91. William Wyler
92. Claude Chabrol
93. Maya Deren
94. Chuck Jones
95. Pier Paolo Pasolini
96. Stan Brakhage
97. Lars von Trier
98. Jacques Tati
99. Richard Linklater
100. Preston Sturges

Continuing Man's revision to the top 100 if that's cool with him. All the changes I could think of for the time being was Wenders' bump and re-arranging of the #64-68 group he suggested.
User avatar
ManPerson
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:57 pm
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by ManPerson »

Here's what I'd suggest

55. Spike Lee
56. Raoul Walsh
57. Bernardo Bertolucci
58. Ridley Scott
59. Vittorio De Sica
60. Paul Thomas Anderson
61. Douglas Sirk
62. Victor Sjostrom
63. John Carpenter
64. Wong Kar-Wai
65. Mario Bava
66. Nicholas Ray
67. Sam Peckinpah
68. Josef Von Sternberg
69. Alain Resnais
70. Rainer Werner Fassbinder
71. Jean Pierre-Melville
72. Max Ophuls
73. Christopher Nolan
74. Wes Anderson
75. Sidney Lumet
76. George A. Romero
77. Busby Berkeley
78. David Cronenberg
79. Chantal Akerman
80. Jean Cocteau
81. John Huston
82. Krzysztof Kieslowski
83. Louis Feuillade
84. Terrence Malick
85. Wim Wenders
86. Alexander Dovzhenko
87. Edwin S. Porter
88. Samuel Fuller
89. Michael Curtiz
90. William Wyler
91. Maya Deren
92. Chuck Jones
93. Pier Paolo Pasolini
94. Stan Brakhage
95. Lars Von Trier
96. Jacques Tati
97. Preston Sturges
98. Agnes Varda
99. Abel Gance
100. King Vidor

Explaining my changes:
Switching Peckinpah and Ray seems a bit unnecessary, even if I'm not necessarily against it.

- I'd definitely give PTA acclaim and body of work over Sirk and Sjostrom atp, though we should probably wait to see how OBAA does during awards season.
- I support moving up Wenders, but maybe a bit lower. I'd probably give Malick and Kieslowski acclaim over him, and that's the category they all clearly excel in.
- Alain Resnais seems pretty close to Melville and Fassbinder when it comes to acclaim and influence and I'd say his body of work is probably a bit stronger.
- I'd give Chantal Akerman acclaim and influence over Huston, Kieslowski and Malick. When compared to Cocteau, I'd give her acclaim, Cocteau influence while body of work is close.
- Dovzhenko seems high. Malick and Kieslowski are probably both more acclaimed at this point and clearly have stronger bodies of work as well. Romero seems to have stronger influence and body of work, Cronenberg loses acclaim but I'd argue he makes up for it in body of work.
- Fuller seems slightly high, since Malick and Kieslowski clearly have stronger acclaim and body of work. Edwin S. Porter seems to be more influential with a stronger body of work.
- Varda's acclaim has improved a ton over the past decade or so, and as a result her body of work has improved as well. Also fairly influential on Left Bank and future female filmmakers.
- King Vidor seems very similar to Abel Gance by the criteria, a bit beaker weaker in influence, but his body of work is also probably stronger. I'd clearly give him acclaim and body of work over Tourneur and he's also an influential director so I don't think Tourneur makes up for it in that category. When compared to Linklater, acclaim and body of work seem close while I'd give Vidor influence.
- Maurice Tourneur seems very high. Miniscule lasting acclaim (compared to others in his range of the list anyway) and a pretty weak body of work as well. Von Trier, Sturges and others in that range seem to clearly take acclaim and body of work.
- Claude Chabrol seems high. Directed arguably the first french new wave film which would give him points in influence, but his body of work and acclaim are not all that strong. Also seems to lose to Von Trier and Sturges in acclaim and body of work, probably even Cukor and Kazan.
Tim
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:23 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Tim »

Looked up Tourneur's influence and that's what I found. I guess you were not really disputing his influence but might be worth bringing up again, def a gamechanger of sorts.
paul on the old forum wrote:Maurice Tourneur is among the absolute top-tier directors of his generation. True, he's not very well-known today. But his influence is huge. Among the first to use atmospheric inserts (shots that don't bring the story forward) and thus was an important progenitor of arthouse cinema. Also, some very influential early horror films. According to some, he directed the first proto-slasher in 1912. Very popular for a few films back then. Three films in the National Film Registry, that's something.
As for Akerman, thoughts?
paul on the old forum wrote:Despite the recent S&S poll, Akerman will always be a mainly a critics' director, much more so than the other names that have been brought up. Her influence and acclaim really are limited to a pretty narrow field. If anything I see her lower. She's more than sixty spots ahead of Rivette and why would the two not be somewhat comparable?
Dubrow on the old forum wrote:Even if Ackerman is more acclaimed (which I don't even really buy), Malick's body of work is so much stronger.
User avatar
ManPerson
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:57 pm
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by ManPerson »

I still think having the greatest film of all time (according to sight & sound anyway) definitely gives her the edge in acclaim over Malick and Kieslowski, but if others think the body of work win for both is big enough, I guess that's fine. I guess saying that Akerman clearly takes influence over both of them was a bit of a stretch as well.

I still think Tourneur should be lower, though that is indeed very significant influence. I'd still say he's clearly beaten by say Chuck Jones in acclaim and body of work while Porter and Feuillade have comparable influence, with Porter clearly taking body of work, acclaim probably being a tie, while Feuillade clearly takes acclaim, body of work probably being a tie. Fwiw, I had him at 101 in my draft, right below Vidor.
Tim
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:23 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Tim »

I was considering moving up PTA as well, given OBAA's success and acclaim but think Sirk's and especially Sjöström's influence win is much more fundamental than PTA's (arguable, imo) acclaim win.
Tim
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:23 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Tim »

And while I am not opposed to Dovzhenko moving down in theory, your demotion seems a little harsh, he remains an acclaimed and influential director and these are 4/5 of criteria, maybe I'd rather group him with someone like Jean Cocteau.
User avatar
ManPerson
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:57 pm
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by ManPerson »

Fair on both accounts.
Tim
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:23 am
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by Tim »

ManPerson wrote:Varda's acclaim has improved a ton over the past decade or so, and as a result her body of work has improved as well. Also fairly influential on Left Bank and future female filmmakers.
I'd agree but I still don't think she beats most of the directors in that #101-120 range by criteria in order for us to add her to the top 100. Most of them either have a ton of influence, really strong body of work, rather strong combination of acclaim and influence or some combination of above.
Last edited by Tim on Sat Jan 17, 2026 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ManPerson
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:57 pm
Contact:

Re: 300 Greatest Movie Directors (Revision Version)

Post by ManPerson »

I'd give her acclaim over Pedro Almodovar, influence is close while Almodovar takes body of work. Similar breakdown with Linklater. Compared to Jarmusch, she takes acclaim, he takes influence, body of work is close. Takes acclaim and body of work over Weber, though influence win is pretty big, Varda's wins are pretty clear as well. Compared with Hou-Hsiao Hsien acclaim is close, influence I'd lean towards Varda while I'd definitely give Varda body of work.
Post Reply

Return to “Directors”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest